Life has some challenges, upsets, and pain in store for all of us – and it’s better to learn how to deal with these things early on, rather than to run into trouble later in life when the stakes get high.Īssuming the worst about others aggravates campus tensions.W e talk incessantly about how to make children more “resilient”, but whatever we’re doing, it’s not working. Is he likely to find it easier to get by when he becomes an adult? Probably not.

Imagine a young person who has been sheltered from difficult emotions for most of his life. In fact, it’s only by facing adversity that we can begin to develop real strength. Sometimes overprotection can be more harmful than allowing young people to encounter challenges and risks. After all, if students need to be “protected” from anything that makes them uncomfortable, why should they be exposed to arguments that make them feel “unsafe?” This term refers to a growing culture that prizes safety at all costs, and sees challenges and difficulties as intolerable burdens that need to be eliminated.īut here’s the thing: safetyism rests on a novel and expanded meaning of the word “safety.” Over time, it’s come to include protection against challenging ideas and feelings of discomfort, not just physical threats.Īnd that means safetyism can be used to silence dissenting students and speakers. Since 2014, student life has been dramatically altered by the rise of safetyism. In the same way, when we try to shelter young people from all of life’s challenges, we run the risk of weakening them in the long term – a phenomenon attested to by life on American college campuses.

They found that without early and repeated exposure to peanuts, many of the kids’ immune systems never learned how to deal with them in a healthy way – leading to serious allergies down the line. In that 2015 study, researchers followed a group of children from infancy to the age of five. The key message here is: Young people need to face challenges in order to become strong. A 2015 study discovered that shielding children from peanuts may have actually been contributing to the surge in allergies. Seems like a good idea, right? Well, not exactly. Faced with the prospect of putting children’s health at risk, many schools decided to ban the foodstuff from lunchboxes altogether. Starting in the mid-nineties, America found itself facing a minor public health crisis, as the rate of peanut allergies in the population began to soar. When you were a kid, were you allowed to bring peanuts to school? If you live in the United States, your answer to that question probably depends on your age.

The coddling of american mind